Interesting,. Found this thread:
… and the suggestion there was to reset the users password. I did that for my main user and it worked immediately on all systems and all is back to normal.
Not sure if this will survive a reboot (in that thread it seems to not work again after rebooting).
~$ sudo midclt call user.query '[["smb", "=", true], ["unixhash", "=", "*"]]'
[]
~$ sudo tail /var/log/middlewared.log
[2025/05/30 19:48:32] (DEBUG) SMBService.update_passdb_user():96 - User [MYUSER] does not exist in the passdb.tdb file. Creating entry with rid [20028].
[2025/05/30 19:48:33] (WARNING) SMBService.update_passdb_user():88 - SMB hash for user [OTHER1] is invalid. Authentication for SMB sessions for this user will fail until this is repaired. This may indicate that configuration was restored without a secret seed, and may be repaired by resetting the user password.
[2025/05/30 19:48:33] (WARNING) SMBService.update_passdb_user():88 - SMB hash for user [OTHER2] is invalid. Authentication for SMB sessions for this user will fail until this is repaired. This may indicate that configuration was restored without a secret seed, and may be repaired by resetting the user password.
[2025/05/30 19:48:33] (WARNING) SMBService.update_passdb_user():88 - SMB hash for user [OTHER3] is invalid. Authentication for SMB sessions for this user will fail until this is repaired. This may indicate that configuration was restored without a secret seed, and may be repaired by resetting the user password.
[2025/05/30 19:48:33] (WARNING) SMBService.update_passdb_user():88 - SMB hash for user [OTHER4] is invalid. Authentication for SMB sessions for this user will fail until this is repaired. This may indicate that configuration was restored without a secret seed, and may be repaired by resetting the user password.
This may point to the problem… MYUSER is my main user for which I reset the password in the TN GUI. Which configuration without the secret seed is it referring to? Any ideas? Not sure what I should have done differently on restoring the config.
Should I file a bug about this? This is not an “obvious” issue to find.