Disk size and setup for a backup server

I don’t have any hardware for this yet. I’ve got my main server, spec in my signature, and it’s time to build my backup server. I’ve currently got about 30TB of data on it. I’m not going to run any apps on this, it just has to sit on my home network and not consume too much space or power and receive backups/replication tasks from my main server. I’m tossing up between these two disk setups.

8 x 14TB HDDs in Raid-Z2
or
5 x 28TB HDDs in Raid-Z2

Both setups will give me a similar amount of usable space.

I’d prefer the 5 disk setup as it will fit in a smaller case and consume less power but I’m really concerned how long scrub and resilver tasks will take. Am I going to regret the 5 x 26TB setup if I go that way?

Between the two options, from my perspective, if the system is ONLY a backup of your main NAS, then the fewer drives, the better.

Let me justify it:
You run a greater risk of data loss using such huge drives during a RESILVER operation due to the days it takes to RESILVER a drive and the possibility to another drive failure, or worse, two drives. BUT, if this is only a copy of your main NAS, you could recover from it.

If you were planning to store other data that was not backed up elsewhere then I’d choose the smaller drives, for the same RESILVERing reason. But for the question you asked, 5 of the 28TB drives will consume less power, might be less expensive as well overall.

If your system allows for the physical addition of one more drive, you could keep a cold spare handy and when you do have a drive failure, add that drive in and and let it RESILVER and replace the failing drive. It is a little safer this way.

Don’t worry about how long a SCRUB takes, the system will run in the background and it’s a backup, who cares how long it takes. It only becomes a pain when you are troubleshooting a problem.

And lets not forget performing routine SMART Short and Long tests. For the 5 drive setup I’d run a Daily Short test (I always recommend this since it takes about 2 minutes) and a depending on the Long test duration, either once or twice every month. I’m leaning towards once a month as I suspect the duration of the Long test could be over 24 hours, but if the drives are spinning all the time, twice a month sounds better. Catch any obvious problems sooner than later.

What are the drive models you were thinking about?

Again, just my opinion. We all have them. You will need to decide what is best for yourself.

3 Likes

I’m looking at used drives like the Seagate Exos ST26000NM000C 26TB 7.2K RPM SATA 6Gb/s 512e CMR 3.5in Recertified Hard Drive from serverpartdeals.com.

Thanks for the advice, makes me feel better about getting the bigger drives. I think I will get a cold spare and stick it in a draw.

I know very little about what makes a HDD beyond SMR is bad. Hopefully I’ll be ok if I stick to something enterprise like that Segate Exos.

Seagate Exos/Ironwolf, Toshiba MG/N300, WD Red Plus|Pro/Gold (= HGST Ultrastar)
whatever NAS/enterprise drive comes cheaper per TB—as long as it is not SMR.

3 Likes

If you do buy a sixth drive as a spare, ensure you run a SMART Long test on it at a minimum before tossing in a desk. Ensure the drive seems sound. And to be honest, I would run a drive burn in test to verify it properly.

1 Like