Wow. I’m looking for a similar setup.
Oh, damn. I was also thinking to run it on an Ubuntu server. What specs is your Ubuntu server and the one that runs in LXC container? Also, I want to ask what file system are you using? Are you storing the incomplete downloads in SSD to avoid fragmentation?
You mean the same torrent pool? I think that’s because NVMe and 10GbE setup.
It’s the Gnome Desktop, access from Windows via RRP, (currently 4 CPU thread s / 16GB RAM) that’s using up the resources. But I like having access to qBittorrent on a desktop. On a Ubuntu Server accessing via the web is no problem.
I’m sharing a zfs dataset via SMB.
Yes, it’s no problem at all, I am considering running the VM images off the same pool (but the storage is already complex enough).
I just wanted fast disk access wherever I needed it, so I created that pool with 4x 4TB NVMe’s (lucky for me that was last year).
With TrueNAS you set separate datasets, with different permissions and settings, all within the same pool. As for the 10Gbe there is little point in having an ultrafast pool if you can access it from anywhere. I do have 3 other pools of spinning disk where the general stuff and media is stored.
Yes, great. I wish i acquired the drives a couple of years ago before the rise in market.
So, I i understand correctly, you have one instance on Ubuntu server and then another in LXC (proxmox) perhaps. Both directly downloads to your 4x 4TB NVMe pool which is on TrueNAS. No storage for the torrenting on the Ubtunu and LXC right?
Ubuntu Desktop.
Correct.
No storage on the qbittorrent, they access via SMB share over the network. If you are planning on doing similar on TrueNAS using Docker apps then the 10Gbe is not so important. Only I use TrueNAS for storage only, and run the apps on Proxmox VM or CT.
Thanks for the info. What do you mean by CT here?
Container
Oh, wow. Okay. Nice.
Any of you guys running Immich?
