Based on the following, that is not accurate: OpenZFS dRAID - A Complete Guide
Leaving resilver time aside, a dRAID-based pool will almost always be more susceptible to total pool failure than a comparable RAIDZ pool at a given parity level. This is because dRAID-based pools will almost always have wider vdevs than RAIDZ pools but still have per-vdev fault tolerance. As discussed above, a pool with 25x 10-wide RAIDZ2 vdevs can theoretically tolerate up to 50x total drive failures while a dRAID configuration with 250x children, double parity protection, and 8 data disks per redundancy group can only tolerate 2x total disk failures. Once we consider the shorter resilver time of dRAID vdevs, the pool reliability comparison becomes a lot more interesting. This is discussed more below.