Power efficient TrueNAS build with super cheap RDIMM (registered ECC memory)?

Welp, I’m a bit late to the party but will post just in case.

Setup details
  1. Asus WS C422 DC.
  2. Xeon W-2123(4c/8t).
  3. 4x Hynix 64G 2666 Reg ECC RAM.
  4. Montech century 550W gold.
  5. 3x 120-140 Fans.
  6. ASM1166.
  7. X520-DA2 10G.
  8. 2x Optane M10 16G as a boot pool.
  9. 3x 2-way mirrors of HC550 as data VDEVs.
  10. D5-P5530 & PM983 as sVDEV.
  11. Cheap no-name Chinese power meter.
Results
Workload :high_voltage:Consumption (W)
All drives connected, locked (pseudo-root of the) pool, network (2 DACs) connected. Pool unlock or pulling the DACs didn’t change consumption. 95
iperf3 9.9G 118-120
TimeMachine backup over Wi-Fi 104-115
Win backup (with built-in backup&restore). Hard (on compression) part with creating system image. CPU peaks are at 80-95% 115-175
### Connected VGA and keyboard for the other tests
All drives (except boot) disconnected 49
X520-DA2 disconnected as well 43-44
### CPU changed to Xeon W-2150B(10c/20t)
Only 2 RAM sticks left
Back to 4 sticks
42
44-46
Removed ASM
Removed keyboard
Removed VGA
42-44
41-43
41-42
Shutted down
Removed keyboard
8.2
7.1
Keyboard, VGA, ASM and X520-DA2 reconnected 50-52
All drives reconnected 97-99
TimeMachine backup over Wi-Fi 103-119
Win backup (same setup). CPU peaks are at 80-93% 122-250
iperf3 9.9G 119-122
fio on zstd-9 NVMe dataset 254-258

:warning: Disclaimer: Backup values are not very useful, and I’m too lazy to properly measure average consumption.

Conclusion:

  1. Seems like the X10SDV-4C-TLN2F and Asus WS C422 DC have the same idle consumption.
  2. Taking into account that supermicro has better on-board network capabilities (IPMI, 10G), it should be considered more power efficient in the corresponding scenarios.

On the bright side, Asus has a much higher CPU upgrade limit (up to 18c/36t) and also a much higher RAM size limit (up to 1TB with W-22XX series). And a lot of PCIe.

1 Like