Hi,
I’m in the process of setting up my TNS backup server, which I built on some low cost components.
I installed this week TNS 25.10.0 and wanted to run a manual long SMART test (as I did with older versions), but then found out that this option was taken out of TNS (not a good idea imho).
I tried to run it as a job, but didn’t really work.
Anyhow, I installed Scrutiny App and one of the disk showed as FAILED. Interestingely, this is the newest HDD in my pool, which is a 10-wide of 10x 4TB HDDs. Some of them are super old SAS drives with many hours, but the FAILED HDD is one of the newest.
It is the following model - Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE168.
I have two of them and they behave differently than the others:
I just installed TrueNAS 25.04.2.6 and ran a manual LONG test - these SSHD (it contains 8GB SSD) takes much longer than the other HDDs (super fast with no content).
Scrutiny App still shows failed, whereas the HDD passed when i connected to my Windows PC.
When I look into the detailed SMART report, it says passed, but also 3 errors were reported (see below)
Question to the experts:
Is the Scrutiny information wrong (and then the tool would be useless) and I should just set up my server, or does scrutiny just have a different threshold for disk health? Is there anything else I should do to examine the health of the HDDs.
(the other drives are old 4TB SAS drives with MANY hours, but I got them for 15 Euro each and in the end it is only a backup from my main fileserver (which runs 4x16TB as striped mirror) and it’s RAIDZ2 for that purpose.
If I would find three more cheap 4TB SATA drives, I would expand to 13 wide as RAIDZ3 with 2x spares to utilize all my HDD connectors (6x Mainboard + 8x HBA). The plan is to run the backup just once per month - kind of semi cold storage.
Not sure which version I should start with…
Thank you for any valuable advice
Alexander


